MI Solutions
Insights/Vendor guides
Vendor guides

SAP Licensing: User Types and How to Optimize Them

How SAP named user licensing works, why user classification drives cost, and a practical review to match each user to the license type their activity requires.

By the MI Solutions SAM team9 min read2 exhibits

SAP's traditional on-premises licensing is built on named users, each classified by the kind of work they do. A professional user who runs complex transactions costs much more than a user who only views reports or records time. Over years, classifications drift: people change roles, accounts are created with generous defaults, and leavers remain licensed. A user classification review is one of the most reliable SAP savings, and it also strengthens your position in SAP's license measurements. In Flexera's 2025 survey, 32% of organizations had been audited by SAP in the previous three years.

User type mix

Exhibit 1
Most SAP users do not need the most expensive license typeNamed user mix before and after a classification review (illustrative)ProfessionalLimited professionalEmployee self-serviceBefore64%21%15%After38%29%33%Illustrative. User type names and definitions vary by SAP contract.

Why classifications drift

01Generous defaults

New accounts set up as professional users "to be safe".

02Role changes

People move to roles that need less, but keep their old classification.

03Leavers

Accounts not expired, so they still count in the measurement.

04Copied users

New users set up as copies of existing ones, inheriting their classification.

A classification review

  1. Extract user activity

    Transactions executed over a representative period, ideally covering a full business cycle.

  2. Map activity to license types

    Using the definitions in your contract, not generic descriptions.

  3. Reclassify users

    Whose activity fits a cheaper type.

  4. Expire leavers and inactive accounts

    And lock accounts nobody uses.

  5. Repeat before each license measurement

    So the measurement reflects reality.

Exhibit 2
What professional users actually didProfessional-classified users by dominant activity over 12 months, illustrative 1,536 users02505007501,000Complex transactions, daily912Display and reporting only288Approvals and workflow174Time and expense entry102No activity60Illustrative. The highlighted 624 users are candidates for a cheaper user type or for expiry.

Also check

01Indirect use

Through third-party systems. See SAP indirect access.

02Engines and packages

Licensed by metrics other than users, such as revenue, employees or records.

03Shelfware

Older purchases that may be swapped or credited in a contract restructuring.

How MI One helps

Frequently asked questions

How often should SAP users be reviewed?

At least annually and before every license measurement.

Can we change a user's license type?

Yes, within the types your contract defines, based on what the user actually does.

Does moving to S/4HANA change this?

It can. Newer contracts may use different user types and metrics. Review classification as part of any migration or contract conversion.

Sources

See where your software budget goes

Bring your five largest vendors to a 30-minute call. Our SAM experts will show you where the savings usually hide, and how fast MI One can surface them.

Book a callFollow us on LinkedIn

Keep reading

Audits and complianceSAP Indirect Access Explained10 min read →Vendor guidesOracle Database Licensing Basics for Non-Specialists10 min read →Vendor guidesZoom, Teams and Webex: Consolidating Collaboration Tools9 min read →