MI Solutions
Insights/Audits and compliance
Audits and compliance

Software Compliance Risks in Mergers and Acquisitions

The software licensing risks in mergers, acquisitions and divestitures: non-transferable licenses, audit exposure, duplicate tools and how to handle them in due diligence and integration.

By the MI Solutions SAM team10 min read3 exhibits

Mergers and acquisitions change who uses software, under which legal entity and on which infrastructure. Licenses that were compliant the day before closing may not be the day after. Some cannot be transferred at all. Others now cover users they were never meant to cover. And publishers know that transactions are a good moment to audit.

Where the risks sit

Exhibit 1
M&A licensing risks by stage and impactWhere to focus during a transaction (indicative)RARE, COSTLYLIKELY, COSTLYRARE, SMALLERLIKELY, SMALLERLikelihood →Financial impact →Non-transferable licensesInherited audit exposureUsers outside licensed entityDuplicate tools after closingDivested users still on parent licensesChange-of-control terminationPositions are indicative.

A deal timeline for software

Exhibit 2
Software work starts in due diligence and ends long after closingTypical licensing workstream across an acquisitionDUE DILIGENCEINTEGRATIONCONSOLIDATION-3036912Months relative to closingContractinventoryTarget's topvendors and clausesExposure pricedRe-licensing andaudit risk in themodelClosingConsents requestedwhere neededEntities alignedWho holds eachlicenseRenewals combinedDuplicates retired;volume leverage

In due diligence

In integration

Integration is where savings and risk arrive together. Combining two estates creates duplicate tools to consolidate and larger volumes to negotiate with, but also users working under contracts that do not cover their legal entity.

Exhibit 3
Integration savings can outweigh re-licensing costsFirst-year software impact of combining two estates, $K, illustrative+$640KDuplicate toolsretired+$380KCombined-volumerenegotiation−$290KRe-licensingnon-transferablesoftware−$120KAudit gap closed−$140KMigration effort$470KNet first-yearimpactIllustrative. The positive items depend on timing: duplicate tools can only be retired at their notice dates.
01Decide who holds each license

Map every agreement to the legal entity that will hold it going forward.

02Map duplicate tools

Across both organizations, and plan consolidation. See application rationalization.

03Align renewals

Capture combined volume in negotiations. See co-terming.

04Talk to publishers early

Where consent is needed, ask proactively rather than waiting to be asked.

In divestitures

01Transition services

Allow the divested business to keep using software for a defined period, where the licenses permit it.

02New agreements

Plan the divested business's own contracts before the transition period ends.

03Reduce the parent's licenses

Once users have moved, so the parent stops paying for them.

How MI One helps

Frequently asked questions

Do software licenses transfer automatically in an acquisition?

Not always. It depends on the contract's assignment terms and the transaction structure. Check each major agreement.

When should SAM get involved in a deal?

During due diligence. Licensing costs discovered after closing are harder to negotiate.

Are publishers more likely to audit after a deal?

Transactions change licensing positions, and publishers are aware of that. Prepare as if a review is likely.

See where your software budget goes

Bring your five largest vendors to a 30-minute call. Our SAM experts will show you where the savings usually hide, and how fast MI One can surface them.